(September 15, 2016 at 2:02 am)Arkilogue Wrote: Your incredulity is adorable!
But your inability to even consider that a government would attack itself to lay false blame and further their military agenda is extremely naive and dangerous, as the they have, repeatedly. You think the second Gulf of Tonkin accident happened? Not according to historians but lord know's everyone was rip roarin to go to war. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/world/...4&emc=eta1
I'll make it real simple for you. Fire did not bring the tower down. Proven. The NIST model omits an obscene amount of data. Proven. The NIST's official model shows deformations that did not occur in real life. Proven.
They should be fired for GROSS negligence.
Next are coming the scientific test to determine exactly what did bring down Building 7 and we'll see won't we?
My incredulity? You're the one that believes that the government orchestrated a false flag attack based on nothing more than some physicists disagree what it would take to bring down one tower. You're the one that believes that the government is so powerful and smart that they could pull off a massive coordination without leaving a single incriminating document or having a whistleblower speak up, but they weren't smart enough to make the demolition appear consistent with the laws of physics. You're the one that believes the government was able to wire three massive buildings with explosives without a single person raising the alarm, but again, they weren't quite smart enough to make it look realistic even though it would most certainly be filmed on live television. You're the one having to cope with the cognitive dissonance it takes to believe the government is all-powerful and intelligent while simultaneously being grossly incompetent.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell