(October 1, 2016 at 11:26 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:(October 1, 2016 at 4:53 am)Little Rik Wrote: Yog.(bold mine)![]()
I cought you red handed my dear.![]()
You say that is me that make claims but what about your statement here below?
You said.......the universe isn't based on luck, it's based on the interaction of matter and energy under natural law.............now let me explain why this is not possible.
The elements in a body can well interact one another but that does not means that that is enough to sustain life.
The liver can interact with the spleen the stomach the lungs the heart the brain and so on but if you do not breath air, if you do not drink, eat move then you die.
What this means?
It means that there got to be external input if we want to survive.
EXTERNAL yog EXTERNAL not internal.
That is what happen with the universal body all the time.
It get constant EXTERNAL input to survive and this input doesn't come from father Christmas.
I just let to you to think where it may come from.
So you say. The last time you brought this up you claimed it was so because the universe is analogous to our body. A statement for which you had no evidence. The universe and my body are not analogous, and even if they were, it would not demonstrate that the universe has a mind like I do. Things can be analogous, yet not share all points of possible similarity. That's why analogies prove nothing. Here we see you making more analogies. Analogies don't prove shit.
It is by using analogies that researchers achieve progress most the time.
Without analogies you are alone and the progress is very very difficult to come.
You never thought about it yog, did you?
