Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 19, 2026, 3:37 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The burden of proof
#13
RE: The burden of proof
Quote:This for me is proof of a designer, why? There are no intermediate transitional forms in the fossil record, only whole creatures of various kinds.

This is a common mistake made by people who don't understand evolution I'm afraid.

Every species on the planet is, as you put it, an intermediate transitional form. Evolution is not working towards any goal and so you will not find any animal which is half one species and half of another as if evolution was working towards the next 'invention'

If you are talking about the fossil record showing evolution at work then there are plenty of examples.

What about the famous Chinese fossils that clearly shows dinosaur skeletons taking on bird characteristics and bird fossils showing the last remnants of their dinosaur heritage.

Then there is the clear evidence of the reptilian jaw showing how the back teeth gradually moved to form the inner ear of its mammal descendant.

Each of these species are of course animals in their own right but each time you discover a species that can be placed between two others you are going to have two find another two that fit between these three. And so on.

Evolution does not work in large chunks as you presumably think but gradually, tiny mutation after another, 99.99999999% of which come to nothing.

It is commonly stated by anti-evolutionists that there are no known transitional fossils. This position is based on a misunderstanding of the nature of what represents a transitional feature. A common creationist argument is that no fossils are found with partially functional features. It is entirely plausible, however, that a complex feature with one function can adapt a wholly different function through evolution. The precursor to, for example, a wing, might originally have only been meant for gliding, trapping flying prey, and/or mating display. Nowadays, wings can still have all of these functions, but they are also used in active flight.

If you really want to understand it then the evidence is there for you to review in bucket loads.

Here are a few intermediate transitional forms for you to look up. Whether you believe or not, they are real!

Archaeopteryx
Ambulocetus
Tiktaalik
Platypus
Australopithecus africanus
Java Man
Homo erectus
Sinanthropus pekinensis

Couldn't resist using this..

[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The burden of proof - by Ace Otana - September 2, 2008 at 8:31 am
RE: The burden of proof - by Eilonnwy - September 2, 2008 at 12:46 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Tiberius - September 2, 2008 at 5:35 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Pete - September 6, 2008 at 10:22 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Brick-top - September 7, 2008 at 7:08 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Brick-top - September 2, 2008 at 6:53 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Tiberius - September 2, 2008 at 6:55 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Brick-top - September 2, 2008 at 7:17 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Meatball - September 7, 2008 at 6:57 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Tiberius - September 8, 2008 at 6:02 am
RE: The burden of proof - by josef rosenkranz - September 14, 2008 at 1:18 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by FutureAndAHope - September 16, 2008 at 8:08 am
RE: The burden of proof - by solidsquid - September 16, 2008 at 2:00 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Darwinian - September 16, 2008 at 8:31 am
RE: The burden of proof - by Darwinian - September 16, 2008 at 2:12 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Tiberius - September 16, 2008 at 3:13 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Edwardo Piet - December 14, 2008 at 11:13 am
RE: The burden of proof - by Purple Rabbit - December 14, 2008 at 11:31 am
RE: The burden of proof - by Edwardo Piet - December 14, 2008 at 12:04 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Purple Rabbit - December 14, 2008 at 12:10 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Edwardo Piet - December 14, 2008 at 12:45 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Godhead - July 23, 2010 at 6:37 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Minimalist - July 23, 2010 at 6:50 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Godhead - July 23, 2010 at 6:57 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by padraic - July 23, 2010 at 7:02 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Godhead - July 23, 2010 at 7:08 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Ashendant - July 23, 2010 at 8:07 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Ace Otana - July 24, 2010 at 9:36 am
RE: The burden of proof - by Godhead - July 23, 2010 at 8:19 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof and evidence will always equal Science zwanzig 103 26654 December 17, 2021 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: awty
  Proof god is a quack! no one 27 7544 January 18, 2021 at 10:10 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Turns out we were all wrong. Here's undeniable proof of god. EgoDeath 6 2801 September 16, 2019 at 11:18 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Always Proof Your Yeast! Fuck Proof of Gods! chimp3 12 4545 September 9, 2018 at 3:46 pm
Last Post: Ravenshire
  Proof of Jesus through Personal testimony. Christianity over other faiths orthodox-man 46 16188 January 29, 2018 at 10:05 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Very short argument for God (another clear proof) Mystic 123 45435 January 26, 2018 at 8:54 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court? Vast Vision 16 8667 July 10, 2017 at 1:34 pm
Last Post: Jesster
  Using scripture as proof. Incoherent-Chaos 19 5534 February 23, 2017 at 10:25 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Is Trump absolute Proof that there's no loving god? The Valkyrie 16 6412 February 22, 2017 at 5:23 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  is this proof of god? goombah111 23 9370 January 2, 2017 at 4:10 pm
Last Post: Alex K



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)