Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 14, 2025, 9:21 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The burden of proof
#13
RE: The burden of proof
Quote:This for me is proof of a designer, why? There are no intermediate transitional forms in the fossil record, only whole creatures of various kinds.

This is a common mistake made by people who don't understand evolution I'm afraid.

Every species on the planet is, as you put it, an intermediate transitional form. Evolution is not working towards any goal and so you will not find any animal which is half one species and half of another as if evolution was working towards the next 'invention'

If you are talking about the fossil record showing evolution at work then there are plenty of examples.

What about the famous Chinese fossils that clearly shows dinosaur skeletons taking on bird characteristics and bird fossils showing the last remnants of their dinosaur heritage.

Then there is the clear evidence of the reptilian jaw showing how the back teeth gradually moved to form the inner ear of its mammal descendant.

Each of these species are of course animals in their own right but each time you discover a species that can be placed between two others you are going to have two find another two that fit between these three. And so on.

Evolution does not work in large chunks as you presumably think but gradually, tiny mutation after another, 99.99999999% of which come to nothing.

It is commonly stated by anti-evolutionists that there are no known transitional fossils. This position is based on a misunderstanding of the nature of what represents a transitional feature. A common creationist argument is that no fossils are found with partially functional features. It is entirely plausible, however, that a complex feature with one function can adapt a wholly different function through evolution. The precursor to, for example, a wing, might originally have only been meant for gliding, trapping flying prey, and/or mating display. Nowadays, wings can still have all of these functions, but they are also used in active flight.

If you really want to understand it then the evidence is there for you to review in bucket loads.

Here are a few intermediate transitional forms for you to look up. Whether you believe or not, they are real!

Archaeopteryx
Ambulocetus
Tiktaalik
Platypus
Australopithecus africanus
Java Man
Homo erectus
Sinanthropus pekinensis

Couldn't resist using this..

[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The burden of proof - by Ace Otana - September 2, 2008 at 8:31 am
RE: The burden of proof - by Eilonnwy - September 2, 2008 at 12:46 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Tiberius - September 2, 2008 at 5:35 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Pete - September 6, 2008 at 10:22 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Brick-top - September 7, 2008 at 7:08 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Brick-top - September 2, 2008 at 6:53 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Tiberius - September 2, 2008 at 6:55 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Brick-top - September 2, 2008 at 7:17 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Meatball - September 7, 2008 at 6:57 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Tiberius - September 8, 2008 at 6:02 am
RE: The burden of proof - by josef rosenkranz - September 14, 2008 at 1:18 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by FutureAndAHope - September 16, 2008 at 8:08 am
RE: The burden of proof - by solidsquid - September 16, 2008 at 2:00 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Darwinian - September 16, 2008 at 8:31 am
RE: The burden of proof - by Darwinian - September 16, 2008 at 2:12 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Tiberius - September 16, 2008 at 3:13 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Edwardo Piet - December 14, 2008 at 11:13 am
RE: The burden of proof - by Purple Rabbit - December 14, 2008 at 11:31 am
RE: The burden of proof - by Edwardo Piet - December 14, 2008 at 12:04 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Purple Rabbit - December 14, 2008 at 12:10 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Edwardo Piet - December 14, 2008 at 12:45 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Godhead - July 23, 2010 at 6:37 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Minimalist - July 23, 2010 at 6:50 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Godhead - July 23, 2010 at 6:57 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by padraic - July 23, 2010 at 7:02 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Godhead - July 23, 2010 at 7:08 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Ashendant - July 23, 2010 at 8:07 pm
RE: The burden of proof - by Ace Otana - July 24, 2010 at 9:36 am
RE: The burden of proof - by Godhead - July 23, 2010 at 8:19 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Always Proof Your Yeast! Fuck Proof of Gods! chimp3 12 2530 September 9, 2018 at 3:46 pm
Last Post: Ravenshire
  Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court? Vast Vision 16 5890 July 10, 2017 at 1:34 pm
Last Post: Jesster
  Burden of Proof Annik 21 7318 December 16, 2013 at 2:22 pm
Last Post: Doubting Thomas
  The burden of proof; who is it on? Creed of Heresy 15 5835 March 7, 2012 at 1:12 am
Last Post: Creed of Heresy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)