(October 13, 2016 at 3:39 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:(October 13, 2016 at 1:38 pm)Kingpin Wrote: ....You've [Rythym] already labeled and stereotyped both the author and the content of the article without reading a single sentence. That is close-mindedness and bigotry at its finest.Closed-minded, yes. Bigotry, no. IMO that charge should be reserved for more serious offenses.
I think it's perfectly reasonable to be suspicious when a known homophobe brings something as innocuous looking as this to the table. Perfectly reasonable to be wary and expect a catch. That said, I'm reading it now and so far, where I'm up to, I'm finding it quite interesting and thought provoking... and nothing yet stands out to me as objectionable. But there's a long way to go.
