RE: How the fuck is there a statute of limitations for rape in New York?
October 13, 2016 at 8:02 pm
(October 11, 2016 at 12:40 pm)Drich Wrote:(October 10, 2016 at 2:45 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote: Was reading the other week about the deposition made by a woman for a civil case who said she was raped at thirteen by our hero Donald Trump on the Huffington Post website, and it stated that the statute of limitations in rape cases in NY is five years. How the fuck is this possible, can anybody explain to me.
Over here, all indictable cases (which include rape) have no statute of limitations imposed. That means if the allegation is brought and the Gardaí and Director of Public Prosecutions feel the case is strong enough for trial the only way there's going to be no trial if a) the alleged perpetrator is dead, or b) the judge is satisfied that, after a lot of evidence is brought, usually including expert reports he commissions, the alleged perpetrator is incapable of defending themselves or of standing trial.
Seriously the situation is fucked up if there is a statute of limitiations on rape in the US.
Here's a thought...
IF it takes a woman or man waits 5 years to report a rape... it wasn't.
If someone drills you in the can and you seriously did not want to be drilled in the can, then why wait over 5 years to report it?
It is far more likely that alleged 'victim' seeks or see to further benefit from said can drilling by changing their consent status. After all how can one prove consent? Now how can one prove consent after such a long time? oh, that's right they don't say anything for more than 5 years.
So how does NY have a statute of limitations on rape? Because at one time the state law makers had a modicum of common sense.
There are a lot of reasons why women don't report being raped. It is not an uncommon thing at all. If there is enough evidence to support the rape years after it happened, I don't see why it can't be investigated and the criminal brought to justice.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh