RE: Is there objective Truth?
October 17, 2016 at 1:55 am
(This post was last modified: October 17, 2016 at 1:58 am by Soldat Du Christ.)
"Now, to go beyond this definition and look for some higher definition of truth is pure folly, and pure imagination. How would we ever know if we arrived at such mythical higher truth without using the brain's existing threshold of truth, which would make the process circular and contradictory."
This is why if you believe in a godless universe, you are either forced into absurdity, everything is subjective. Or you have to give a reason, a justification for your use of objectivtivity. See, naturalism cannot justify naturalism, in much the same way the brain cannot justify the brain. But supernaturalism can justify naturalism.
OR! You could go the route Dawkins is going, forget reason, not everything needs a reason!
Either 3 ways you are unreasonable
This is why if you believe in a godless universe, you are either forced into absurdity, everything is subjective. Or you have to give a reason, a justification for your use of objectivtivity. See, naturalism cannot justify naturalism, in much the same way the brain cannot justify the brain. But supernaturalism can justify naturalism.
OR! You could go the route Dawkins is going, forget reason, not everything needs a reason!
Either 3 ways you are unreasonable
