(October 13, 2016 at 12:49 pm)Kingpin Wrote:(October 13, 2016 at 12:46 pm)Rhythm Wrote: I'm of the opinion that the substance and conclusion of the report serves the publishers agenda, like everything else they publish. Next.
So on this basis we should ignore on all Op-ED pieces? It's this type of close minded thinking that prohibits rational discussion between people of differing viewpoints. How can we discuss differing viewpoints if we don't take the time to listen to what the other side has to say?
But what has this to do with viewpoints. That's the problem from the start. It's a group pushing their viewpoints and pretending like its unbiased science.