RE: How the fuck is there a statute of limitations for rape in New York?
October 18, 2016 at 12:19 pm
(October 18, 2016 at 10:30 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Drich is the master of definition manipulation for the purpose of suiting his needs in a particular discussion. He will literally MANGLE a word to the point that it is unrecognizable just to save face. Then, after making himself look like a complete fool for clinging to one grotesquely mutilated definition rather than admit he was proven unequivocally wrong about something, he'll flaunt "victory". It's like...one of the saddest things I've ever witnessed around here.
I haven't mangled anything I cut and pasted definition from US Legal Definitions.
You have identified the problem correctly. In that one of us is twisting definitions to suit our personal understanding of how things should work.. you are just confused on your role and mine.
I made the statement that rape as a criminal act (not an unprossicutable accusation) is only legally actionable if it fits within the definition/parameters of a criminal act. If it doesn't then there is no difference between rape (legally speaking) and forced sex... which despite western prohibition fuels the majority world's traditional view on sex.