RE: How the fuck is there a statute of limitations for rape in New York?
October 18, 2016 at 2:26 pm
(October 18, 2016 at 12:35 pm)Drich Wrote: My Argument has nothing to do with the specifics of how rape is identified legally, BECAUSE No Matter The Defination It Can Be Summed Up As A Criminal Act.
Do You Understand? Let me concede your definition. Now plug that definition into my argument. Which means your defination becomes my criminal act..
Still with me?
Now lets look at my definition of criminal act:
Criminal act is an act committed by a person that violates a law and which is punishable by the government. Criminal acts are offenses against the public which are punishable. It can be any act or omission or possession which poses a threat to the public.
http://definitions.uslegal.com/c/criminal-act/
Ok NOW Remove the Government's ablity to prosecute your legally defined act. Per a SOL.
Then your accusation of Rape ceases to be a criminal act by definition of the term, as it is not prosecutible.
Then Effectively/Legally speaking There is NO Difference between Rape and forced sex. because again there isn't any legal recourse
Now miss smarty pants, If what I am saying is not 110% true then why can't someone accused of rape after the SOL be prosecuted?
Go line by line if you can and correct my logic where it is wrong.
I'm not asking you for the legal definition of rape. I want to see where you can find a definition of rape that says it is only the illegal act. I am not looking for another one of your dodges. I'm not asking for the definition of criminal. Again, link a definition of rape that says rape is only rape if it is illegal and prosecutable. K? Are ya following me?