RE: How the fuck is there a statute of limitations for rape in New York?
October 18, 2016 at 3:16 pm
(October 18, 2016 at 1:44 pm)Drich Wrote:(October 18, 2016 at 1:01 pm)Rhythm Wrote: The women in your asian example (which has jack shit to do with US law, btw) would be willing participants in a cultural drama, or so you'd have us believe. Obviously, a willing participant has not been raped. She has not been forced.
Something tells me that even in asia, the state can secure a conviction of rape from time to time. You're wrong about SOLs, you're wrong about rape, and your own silly fucking examples argue against you.
EXACTLY
I am simply providing a narritive of forced sex Not being an example of rape.
The Difference between rape and forced sex is consent.
The asian women who Consent to forced sex EVEN HERE IN THE US, are not being raped even though they may endure a similar physical act. Which is how the law applies.
I said that to refute the idea there forced sex is always rape/ There can not be an example of forced sex without it being considered rape.
Go back a few pages and look at all the self righteous condemnation you were just apart of or have you already forgotten?
Wait what? If there is consent, the sex is not forced. You can't force someone to do something they're already doing willingly that makes no sense.