RE: How the fuck is there a statute of limitations for rape in New York?
October 18, 2016 at 3:40 pm
(October 18, 2016 at 3:23 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote:(October 18, 2016 at 3:16 pm)Losty Wrote: Wait what? If there is consent, the sex is not forced. You can't force someone to do something they're already doing willingly that makes no sense.
Consent and force are not exclusive in that context, they can actually go hand in hand. You consent to it before the actual act takes place, but then you get in character and you don't. You resist and the other party resorts to force. That's the whole point of it and is what Drich is talking about, I believe. Everyone is purposefully misunderstanding him. I wonder if it has anything to do with him being a theist.
Yes I'm objecting to his opinion because he's a theist
Are you a theist? Did you know that there's a difference between using physical force and actually forcing someone to do something? You can play pretend all you like (even when it's a cultural norm and not a sex game it's still playing pretend) but the second you're legitimately forcing someone it is rape. If she's not pretending to resist it's is rape. If she's pretending to resist it is not forced sex.
