Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 22, 2025, 5:22 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How the fuck is there a statute of limitations for rape in New York?
RE: How the fuck is there a statute of limitations for rape in New York?
(October 18, 2016 at 7:43 pm)KevinM1 Wrote:
(October 18, 2016 at 5:25 pm)Faith No More Wrote: Ha, it's funny how you purposefully left out the second definition, you troll...

verb
1.
make a way through or into by physical strength; break open by force.
"they broke into Fred's house and forced every cupboard door with ax or crowbar"
synonyms: break open, burst open, knock down, smash down, kick in
"the door had to be forced"
2.
make (someone) do something against their will.
"she was forced into early retirement"
synonyms: compel, coerce, make, constrain, oblige, impel, drive, pressurize, pressure, press, push, press-gang, bully, dragoon, bludgeon; More

Dammit, Just when I thought I was out...[he] pulls me back in [with his stupidity].

I was just about to post the same thing.

When people are talking about forced sex, they're using the second definition of forced.  Which makes it rape.

Of course, trollishly leaving out that second definition that utterly torpedoes his 'argument' (such as it is) dovetails nicely into the portion of the conversation addressing special pleading....

But he's so much smarter than the rest of us.  Just ask him, he'll tell you!
and i am using the first.

In that a man physically forces himself onto a resistant but willing partner. I've said that 10's of times..

Can't you see by doing that, I qualified the statement and my specific use of the definition by providing a legitimate context that backs my usage of the term.

I have said several times my usage of the word forced does not mean one is made to do something against their will.

I have many times described the physical force used in a consensual way...

So the big question is why am I holding to my definition?

To demonstrate that one does not have to rank and file think and act in accordance with the popular consensus and still have a valid point. That thier is more than one way to view a subject, and most importantly if you are not flexible enough to consider anything other than what you bring into a conversation, I want you to understand your mind is closed. Closed to anything you don't already think you know.

Subsequently I want to point out that you all have been condition to only receive new information if it is present one specific way. That you frown on original free thought and will not openly debate any real topic. If you think you know something you are not willing to examine it any other way.

In this thread are many sub-topics this last one on the word forced is a prime example. most of you locked on to a tradition understanding of the word forced in a sexual context. this brought up a very singular picture of how 'forced sex' can work. To which I countered a senerio that showed a very popular example of forced sex NOT incompliance with your stereotypical view. I outlined the usage of the term, i even provided back ground and showed you that your understanding of sex is indeed in a minority view. Yet you all assume my use of the word is in error...

Here's the thing morons...

We are BOTH correct.

Forced sex per the second defination of the word is to coherse sexual intercourse against the will of another.
However to have Forced sex, describes sexual intercourse with physical resistance, and one partner forced or over comes the other physically.

The difference???

CONSENT

So Again for the very slow among you Forced sex is to coherse (against the will of another) sex from an unwilling partner.

AND

It can describe Consensual sex where one partner resists another physically and yet consent to the act.

The devil here/The evil is in the details. If I give an senerio that does not support a legal sexual assault yet physically describe an act that could play for play leave the same exact physical evidence as a sexual assault then know I am not talking about the sterotype you automatically associate with when the words forced and sex are used together.

Your mind should be flexible enough to ask a question, seek a defination and examine the senerio to see if the defination fits. if it does then open the rusty vault you call a mind and make room for a slightly broader POV.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: How the fuck is there a statute of limitations for rape in New York? - by Drich - October 19, 2016 at 10:35 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Melania: "Fuck Christmas!" Fake Messiah 17 2219 October 2, 2020 at 4:36 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  Liam Neeson: Rape, Revenge, and Race Relations Rev. Rye 233 29337 February 21, 2019 at 4:10 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Fuck Your Property Rights, You Scumbag Bastard Minimalist 0 661 October 1, 2018 at 5:20 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Please Do It, You Dumb Fuck. Sue Him! Minimalist 19 2627 September 6, 2018 at 11:45 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Court of Appeals Tells Alabama Shitheads to "Fuck Off!" Minimalist 6 1629 August 23, 2018 at 2:00 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  What in the fuck is a Patriot Prayer? GODZILLA 18 2855 August 6, 2018 at 12:40 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Never Fuck With A Billionaire's Money! Minimalist 5 1186 July 29, 2018 at 5:47 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Then Your Culture Needs A Lot of Work, You Dumb Fuck Minimalist 13 2462 July 23, 2018 at 1:25 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  You Know What? Fuck Him. Minimalist 8 1401 May 25, 2018 at 10:53 am
Last Post: Tiberius
  SCOTUS Tells Anti-Abortion Nuts To Go Fuck Themselves Minimalist 294 40465 April 11, 2018 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: vorlon13



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)