RE: How the fuck is there a statute of limitations for rape in New York?
October 19, 2016 at 5:57 pm
(October 19, 2016 at 5:43 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: You're right, of course, but Hitler's memoir is significant in this context, as well, since his attitude toward Slavs goes directly to the point that his policies were racially motivated.
Hitler more or less ontinued Bismarck's social model. Keep the population nice and quiet by offering them candies. That often is interpreted as being left, which he certainly wasn't. I guess hardly anyone in their right mind and having some historical knowledge would call Bismarck left. But Bismarck was a very intelligent politician. He observed the rise of social democtrats and gave the people social security. Not because he cared about the great unwashed, but because he knew a content population was less prone to rebellion.
Same goes for Hitler. The only difference being that Hitler didn't have the financial means to do so. He drove the country deeper and deeper into debt. Which didn't concern him much, since his ultimate goal - one of the few true parts of Mein Kampf - was to occupy new territories to pay for his loans.
Yes, he despised Slavs and Jews, but the only difference to other leaders and prominent figures was his radicalism in these days. He associated jew with communist and ironically at the same time with capitalist. The reason for that being that Bela Kuhn in Hungary and Kurt Eisner had been jews, as well as some of the prominent figures of the Russian revolution.