RE: Is there objective Truth?
October 20, 2016 at 7:19 am
(This post was last modified: October 20, 2016 at 7:22 am by Soldat Du Christ.)
Aah okay i see what you are trying to say now. I think. 
And yes you are 99% there, for the sake of clarity i will nitpick your words. And i expect the same from you so i can also better understand.
So you are all correct up until
"from your perspective, this approach to truth seeking lacks an objective basis. Therefore, supernaturalism is the better approach toward finding objective truth."
Naturalism lacks a justification for the use of objectivity. They can count, but cannot account for there counting. So are just as capable of finding truth. The issue with not having a reason to comform to objectivity, it makes you free to bend and twist the truth according to your prefrence. Morality is a perfect example of this effect, and you can see it's negetive effects on society. But that may be straying off topic, you pretty much got it.
Now, as far as "human sense making" goes, would you agree that this decition is the ultimate axiom? Can we agree on that much?
And yes you are 99% there, for the sake of clarity i will nitpick your words. And i expect the same from you so i can also better understand.So you are all correct up until
"from your perspective, this approach to truth seeking lacks an objective basis. Therefore, supernaturalism is the better approach toward finding objective truth."
Naturalism lacks a justification for the use of objectivity. They can count, but cannot account for there counting. So are just as capable of finding truth. The issue with not having a reason to comform to objectivity, it makes you free to bend and twist the truth according to your prefrence. Morality is a perfect example of this effect, and you can see it's negetive effects on society. But that may be straying off topic, you pretty much got it.
Now, as far as "human sense making" goes, would you agree that this decition is the ultimate axiom? Can we agree on that much?
