RE: Have you ever tried to debate Christians that have no clue?
June 3, 2011 at 1:01 pm
(This post was last modified: June 3, 2011 at 1:02 pm by Doubting Thomas.)
(June 3, 2011 at 2:23 am)Minimalist Wrote: I had one jackass on another board tell me that because there was no evidence for the exodus that was proof that it happened.
I mean.....if you want to talk about fucking stupid, start with that.
Sounds like when I used to debate conspiracy theorists. If there was no proof of a conspiracy, it just meant that it was even more real. I guess if you can't find proof of a government conspiracy, then the government is just really good at covering it up.
(June 3, 2011 at 2:12 am)Dean-o Wrote: the blood from the shroud of turin is AB negative
LOL, I wonder where she pulled this from? I don't remember ever seeing where any studies were ever done on the "blood" on the shroud, not like you could get a blood type from 2000-year-old dried blood anyway. And furthermore, it's not even blood on the shroud since it's still red in color. Real blood stains in cloth turn black over time. Oh, right, the fact that it's still red is just another miracle.
I love how Christians can take items of half-truths or totally bald-faced lies and pass them around as verified fact as long as it agrees with what they want to believe. But show them actual scientific facts which disagrees with what they want to believe and they'll deny it to their dying day.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
