(October 24, 2016 at 1:07 am)Soldat Du Christ Wrote:(October 24, 2016 at 1:04 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: No, my objection is that you're making an argument from ignorance and so your conclusion is invalid. Furthermore, you've yet to justify how God provides any better explanation for objectivity that is in any way superior to it merely being a brute fact. Goddidit! and Brute Fact have exactly the same explanatory value. Neither is superior to the other as an explanation for why there are objective facts.
Is "Brute fact" another way of saying the brain justifies the brain? Or special pleading (neccecary precondition)?
What justifies God?
