(October 24, 2016 at 12:58 am)Soldat Du Christ Wrote:(October 24, 2016 at 12:50 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: Bollocks. The use of objectivity is neither justified or established by a transcendant cause, i.e. God, anymore than it is by naturalistic explanation. This seems to depend on an extreme form of the PSR, implying that everything must have an explanation. It's trivial to define God as a lawgiver. Such definitions come cheap. It does not follow from an inability of a naturalist to justify their use of the objective that objectivity requires a transcendant cause. That's an argument from ignorance. Let's call a spade a spade. You're arguing that the existence of objective facts requires God. That's the most ludicrous assertion I've heard lately and is not supported by an argument from ignorance.
So digging through all the unnececary filler everything which doesn't conform to my own ideas, your response is we don't need a explanation for everything is that correct?
Happy to fix that for you, gratis.
