Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 24, 2024, 8:34 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
#13
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 4, 2016 at 12:46 am)robvalue Wrote: It's a fair hypothesis that this is some sort of simulation, yeah. It appears unfalsifiable to me, although it's certainly interesting. I'm concerned there is a fallacy of composition included in the hypothesis though, and it requires several assumptions.

The universe simulation hypothesis (particularly  relating to our universe) is the least relevant scenario mentioned. (As seen in solely ONE god-tier, #3)

Primarily, A God bound entity likely has the ability to create non-trivial intelligence  (The most complex constructs in the known universe human level, and likely beyond)

Thereafter, on Moore's Law etc, we are likely on the horizon of creating such non-trivial intelligence.  

(NOTE: Brain based models already exceed/equal humans on non trivial cognitive tasks, ranging from language translation to disease diagnosis)

(November 4, 2016 at 1:03 am)robvalue Wrote: Erm, you can't exactly say a definition is wrong when no one ever agreed on one in the first place.

Is it necessary to write everything in varying text size and colours? Tongue It makes it a bit hard to read.

Note [0] : I am not saying anything. Rather, I need not say anything. On observation of statistics, (trivially observable by any non-brain damaged being) such a definition of God is naturally, statistically observable. (See the note atop the original post, pertaining to abstinence from opinion/say)

Therein, there are already existent definitions of God, which are likely wrong, on statistical observation.

Note [1]: I was attempting to shorten the content. The simple 3 minute passage seems to be 2 hours long absent text variation.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist - by Minimalist - November 3, 2016 at 11:02 pm
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God) - by ProgrammingGodJordan - November 4, 2016 at 1:04 am
He is cray - by Edwardo Piet - November 7, 2016 at 8:11 am
why - by ohreally - November 10, 2016 at 1:56 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof and evidence will always equal Science zwanzig 103 9283 December 17, 2021 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Young more likely to pray than over-55s - survey zebo-the-fat 16 1899 September 28, 2021 at 5:44 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Is God weaker than theists imagine, and is mankind stronger? invalid 6 2544 March 5, 2021 at 6:38 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Are miracles evidence of the existence of God? ido 74 6068 July 24, 2020 at 12:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Muslim students less likely to be awarded top class degrees. Succubus#2 28 2950 March 22, 2020 at 6:02 am
Last Post: Belacqua
  Religious fundamentalists more likely to believe fake news OakTree500 30 4546 November 10, 2018 at 4:32 pm
Last Post: no one
  If theists understood "evidence" Silver 135 15995 October 10, 2018 at 10:50 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Moses parting the sea evidence or just made up Smain 12 3240 June 28, 2018 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Are introverts less likely to like organised religion? Der/die AtheistIn 8 1524 March 22, 2018 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: GODZILLA
  Can religion be a type of Stockholm syndrome? ignoramus 5 2924 June 10, 2017 at 9:54 am
Last Post: Cyberman



Users browsing this thread: 29 Guest(s)