RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 4, 2016 at 5:57 am
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2016 at 5:58 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 4, 2016 at 5:10 am)Rhythm Wrote: Perhaps this escaped you, since you keep harping on about how we'll be able to make a better box soon.....but no one is disputing that.
One wonders how the acknowledgement of advancing computational architectures..combined with a bit of fuzzy thinking about simulations, is evidence of a god. Now, I'm sure that it would be easy to say "well, I've defined gods as such and such", but seeing as how any schmoe with a dick already fits your description of a "god"... the entire bit...text baiting and all, collapses into inanity.
I haven't any description.
It is rather that, on observation of statistics, God is describable as an entity with the ability to generate non-trivial artificial intellect, that exceeds the net intelligence of its species.
A particular property of the theistic God is the ability to generate non-trivial, human level intellect (where other properties are likely nonsense)
Both females and males do machine learning work, therein mankind is likely god-bound. (man/woman, rather than solely males, are thereafter likely god-bound; as observed in the original, unedited post).