RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 4, 2016 at 10:26 pm
(November 4, 2016 at 7:57 am)Rhythm Wrote: In fairness, we have to acknowledge that it's unlikely that the brains architecture is, in any way, optimized for intelligence as an intentional computational architecture would be...and also that we're not really sure how much of a brain it takes to produce intelligence - it's interesting to note that with a fraction of the standard model, people have been known to survive and function (and while we might consider their function reduced, it doesn't seem to necessitate a disability even by a standard scale of IQ) with 10% of the normal nueron count. So, best case scenario (as in making it easier to achieve the task at hand) we're talking about some unknown portion of an unoptimized 10%, as being able to produce the effect.
While acknowledging the above might bring the sum total down by orders of magnitude (assuming that's the obstacle in the first place, it may not be), it would still be an impressively large number of hypothetical "x" even at a 1-1 exchange..which we know it isn't. I, personally, doubt we'll see a superhuman intelligence by 2040...but I wouldn't rule out CletusBot. I certainly wouldn't rule out cleverly designed mimics...and that opens a huge can of philosophical worms.
Until those floating variables above are better defined, I'd say any position on either of the far ends of the plausibility spectrum are unfounded. Confident extraplations that we either will or won't see "x" by "y" are based, equally, on a lack of knowledge. Just fun with math, really. So the singularity folks..they like to imagine that they'll live to see ai. The skeptics like to imagine that the task at hand is almost unfathomably grand. Both pick numbers to suit.
You are blatantly ignoring the neurosynaptic regime.
IBM has already constructed neurosynaptic chips, that better approximate the human neuronal calculation cycle (10^ 15 flops).
The entirety of your commentary occurs amidst the Von Neumannian paradigm, of central processing unit bound constructs. (Whence CPU systems induce larger space-time complex calculations, than those of non CPU aligned systems - neurosynaptic chips. [See IBM synapse])
