RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 5, 2016 at 1:27 am
(This post was last modified: November 5, 2016 at 1:33 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 5, 2016 at 1:18 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: I addressed that. It's an analogy not an anecdote.
Redefining "God" doesn't create God.
Simplification:
[*A*]
[0] Your banana-bound commentary lacks logical comparison.
[1] Anecdotes lack logical comparison.
...
[*B*]
Mankind satisfies (non-omniscient, non-omnipotent entity approaching the ability to generate non trivial intelligence that shall likely entirely exceed mankind) such a scientifically statistically observable definition qua God.
NOTE [1]: Brain based models have already equaled/exceeded mankind in tasks/task groups, ranging from language translation to disease diagnosis.
NOTE [2]: Such redefinition (reduction rather) occurs on the horizon of scientifically statistically observable statistics, absent opinion/emotion/faith/bias/belief.