Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

Prominent gods?  

You're actually only thinking of one god across it's faith family.  The god's aren't prominent in any case, they're non-existent, their believers are simply numerous.  Further, you're attempting to count a hit and ignore the misses.  Is that the -only- specific trait of that specific god?  Nope.  In fact, it; all the other traits of that god that distinguish it from "peole who make smart machines".

Unless you'd like to continue to argue that men are becoming yahweh, specifically, -which ofc we aren't by reference to all of those other traits-... modify your language.

Your thought cycles are but nonsensical.
Are you of theistic descent?

[*A*]

Simply, aforesaid statistics persist on the boundary of prominently religiously described Gods. [As encoded amidst the original post]



[*B*]


Re-Stipulation:

Tradition (theistic deity definition) contains (on the horizon of scientifically observable probabilities/statistics) non-evident properties.


In contrast, the definition (as observed in the original post) reduces traditional deity-bound properties, abound scientifically observable probabilities/statistics, such that a particular property is evident - thusly the ability to forge non-trivial intelligence, and thereafter, said intelligence shall likely exceed the net intelligence of the creator's(s') species...whilst separately theist-theorized properties [omniscience, omnipotence etc] likely shan't obtain, particularly on the horizon of aforesaid observable probabilities/statistics.)


Thusly, God is properly statistically definable, as observed amidst the original post.  (Only the theistic mind adheres to the concept of omniscient, omnipotent deities)