RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 6, 2016 at 7:59 am
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2016 at 8:01 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:51 am)mh.brewer Wrote:It is rather non fortunate, that I am but non omniscient.(November 6, 2016 at 7:42 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Exemplification:
Whether or not one BELIEVES in science is rather irrelevant, for science OBTAINS, regardless of one's decision to select belief in such.
Therein, BELIEF is an irrelevant quantity.
One need NOT belief, such that one OBSERVES PROBABILITIES.
Such is quite the theistic mannerism...
Ouch.
So, tell me. What is it that you appear to be over compensating for?
I thereafter, in a hobyyist fashion, research such that artificial human exceeding intelligence is logically hypothesized/encoded...
(See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE')
(November 6, 2016 at 7:59 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote:(November 6, 2016 at 7:52 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Precisely, you express nonsense.
YOUR FAILURE:
You fail to recognize that one need NOT BELIEF, such that one OBSERVES a sequence's VIABILITY.
PROBABLY.
Your failure is but CERTAIN.