Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

Bestow or don' t ! My statement stands. All you are doing is embellishing human activities with comic book jargon and begging people to find your words amazing.

Facing, are your failures:

[0] You fail to recognize, that said stipulations are but non-opinionated. [Such occur on globally scientifically observable statistics]

[1] You persistently invoke anecdotal nonsense. [ie illogical comic book references]

Are you thereafter of theistic descent?



Perhaps it is exigent that you fulfill the facing exercise:

Identify ONE opinionated sequence of mine.

---

Man in 2016 BCE: IT'S TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN.

Man in 2016 CE: IT'S SIMULATIONS ALL THE WAY DOWN.

Albeit:

The universe simulation hypothesis (particularly relating to our universe) is the least relevant scenario mentioned. (As seen in solely ONE god-tier, #3, original post)

Primarily, A God bound entity likely has the ability to create non-trivial intelligence  (The most complex constructs in the known universe - human level, and likely beyond)

Thereafter, on Moore's Law etc, we are likely on the horizon of creating such non-trivial intelligence.  

(NOTE: Brain based models already exceed/equal humans on non trivial cognitive tasks, ranging from language translation to disease diagnosis)

---

This is the trouble with the field of AI, it suffers the same problem as Quantum Mechanics today, or nuclear physics 80 years ago. Because there are currently way more questions than answers it allows any crackpot to come in and insert their god into the gap. It gives them the means to give scientific sounding names to the magic they need for their fantasy beliefs. When scientists start making some form of progress and the theory gets too complicated for the average person to even contemplate pretending they understand, the fantasists move onto something. This thread is a perfect example of it.

Nonsense.
It is likely [On Moore's Law], rather, that mankind shall perhaps promptly generate general artificial intelligence [particularly non-trivial brain-bound hardware, at the human neuronal capacity 10^15 flops].

Thereafter, your commentary is quite worthless.





Observations:




[0] Moore's Law is a half-century long, observed phenomenon.

[1] Brain based models, this day, exceed/equal human performance in non trivial, cognitive tasks.