RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 7, 2016 at 10:11 pm
(This post was last modified: November 7, 2016 at 10:35 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
An erratum of mine:
INITIAL STATEMENT:
(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]
ERRATUM:
(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particularly abound Trigonometric Integration]
Invalid.
I had, four years prior, naively (albeit logically) axiomatized consciousness, amidst an equation. See "Consciencia_Aequatio".
Therein, for any computational system observed, there exists some non-polynomially computable function [on planck-einsteinian relation].
Thereafter, existence is uniformly distributed at the boundary of said asymptote; therein, asymptotical indifference (amidst existence's constituents) persists.
As such, inferiority is but inconsequential/asymptotically inexistent.
INITIAL STATEMENT:
(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]
ERRATUM:
(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particularly abound Trigonometric Integration]
(November 7, 2016 at 6:48 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:(November 7, 2016 at 6:37 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: THEIST likely accurately describes your religious stance, on observation of your irrelevant, nonsensical anecdotes...
Oh, ouch. And actually, based on what I and others can see in your behavior, (user name, flamboyance, attention seeking, dismissing what you can't defend) you appear to be the prototypical ego maniac with an inferiority complex.
I could have been wrong. More like little fish/little pond synd.
Invalid.
I had, four years prior, naively (albeit logically) axiomatized consciousness, amidst an equation. See "Consciencia_Aequatio".
Therein, for any computational system observed, there exists some non-polynomially computable function [on planck-einsteinian relation].
Thereafter, existence is uniformly distributed at the boundary of said asymptote; therein, asymptotical indifference (amidst existence's constituents) persists.
As such, inferiority is but inconsequential/asymptotically inexistent.