RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 8, 2016 at 1:54 am
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2016 at 3:45 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 7, 2016 at 11:43 pm)Nymphadora Wrote: @ OP:
Lmao... learn to use quote tags correctly (see page 21). And stop assuming people who differ in their opinions are theists. Sorry, again, you don't get to tell people what they think or feel or believe because you are not them.
Wash, rinse, repeat.
/thread.
Shall one stipulate strings of disregard [that ignore internationally scientifically observable statistics] said speaker is likely of theistic nature, for theists tend to ignore scientific evidence.
Separately, via page 21, I had approached several streams of expressions of sillily attributed arguments [individually], in tandem with user Jormungandr.
(November 7, 2016 at 11:07 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: "PGJ" doesn't actually stand for "Programming God Jordan" it actually stands for "Poe Gets Jaunty".
JAUNTY BEHAVIOUR is but irrelevant. (..for I simply state statistics).
LEMMA OF MINE:
(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]
(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See '
EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}
(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}
(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quantum** computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.
'quantum' Is highlighted, as an erratum.
Query:
Alasdair , perhaps it is exigent that you express your most profound lemma.