RE: Hi, an agnostic here ... just agnostic.
November 8, 2016 at 4:56 am
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2016 at 4:59 am by TheHuxleyAgnostic.)
(November 8, 2016 at 4:37 am)Irrational Wrote:(November 8, 2016 at 4:34 am)TheHuxleyAgnostic Wrote: Yes, that's what "true" means ... "not false".
A: belief P, no belief ~P
B: no belief P, no belief ~P
C: no belief P, belief ~P
Person A and Person C make no sense. Unless I'm misunderstanding the notations.
Must be misunderstanding.
X = gods exist
A: has a belief "gods exist", has no belief "gods do not exist"
B: has no belief "gods exist", has no belief "gods do not exist"
C: has no belief "gods exist", has a belief "gods do not exist"
b:g|~b:~g
~b:g|~b:~g
~b:g|b:~g
Ummm...
If you believe the store is open, you're not believing the store is closed.
If you have no clue if the store is open, or closed, then you have no belief, either way.
If you believe the store is closed, you're not believing the store is open.
(November 8, 2016 at 4:53 am)Jesster Wrote: Lol no. While the reality is either X or not X, the question is about belief instead of what the definitive reality is. Two entirely different questions there.
I really don't care about persuading "random internet person"
You can keep asserting "the question is", but it won't change the fact that you're just arbitrarily choosing to do things that way.
If you don't care about persuading, then why didn't you just leave it at me not being a fan?
