RE: Hi, an agnostic here ... just agnostic.
November 8, 2016 at 3:25 pm
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2016 at 3:38 pm by ApeNotKillApe.)
(November 8, 2016 at 10:52 am)TheHuxleyAgnostic Wrote:(November 8, 2016 at 5:03 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: 'The store is open' is a statement I understand. Don't know what 'gods exist' is even supposed to mean.
Same result, suspension of judgement. No belief, either way. Both have roots in Pyrrhonic scepticism.
Sextus Empiricus:
“Let the Dogmatists first agree and concur with one another that god is such and such, and only then, when they have sketched this out for us, let them expect us to form a concept of god. But as long as they do not settle their disagreements we cannot tell what agreed-upon conception we are supposed to get from them.”
“Furthermore, if we go by what the Dogmatists say, even if we form a conception of god it is necessary to suspend judgment concerning whether he exists or does not exist. For it is not pre-evident that god exists.”
So discounting gibberish as gibberish is a 'suspension of judgement' so long as said gibberish is posed as a question.
What's your opinion on the fggralgaspibbling of xandanglulate?
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.