Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

Argument ad naus.  Fail.

Perhaps you should complete the facing exercise.

Manufacture a rational argument that leverages sound propositions within the framework of a valid means of inference.

[*A*]

Nonsense.

Mot juste, the original post, of mine, had long compounded on internationally, scientifically observable statistics.

Perhaps it is exigent that you fulfill the facing exercise:
Stipulate one error amidst said original post. [rather than stipulating of errors' existence, absent specific notation of said errors]




[*B*]

The absence of research amidst critical topics, amidst thine, [ie machine learning, physics] shall likely fashion errors amidst observational abilities of thine.

Observe areas of focus, of mine:


(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particular abound Trigonometric Integration]


(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See '

EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}



(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}


(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quantum computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.


[*C*]
Therein, what is your profession's nature?
Have you fulfilled at minimum, secondary education?