RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 9, 2016 at 2:34 pm
(This post was last modified: November 9, 2016 at 2:36 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 7, 2016 at 6:21 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:(November 7, 2016 at 6:06 pm)Mathilda Wrote: Time diverges from what? You're sort of saying the right words but putting them all in the wrong order. For example, life like properties emerge from self organisation, not the other way round.
Dissipative structures are thought to be responsible for the increase in complexity over time. This is because self organisation works by minimising free work, that is energy that can do work, and one way that the energy can be minimised is by being dissipated. My own personal findings which I really need to publish sometime are that dissipative structures per se are not enough for both complex and dynamic systems to be created.
[*A*]
Your comprehension of English, is rather sub par.
I shall bi-stipulate said sentence [en variation], such that you may trivially observe of the non difference in meaning:
(0) Initial sentence:
Albeit, in the attribution of like like properties, self-organization is quintessentially OBSERVED...
(1) Alternate sentence (of precise non difference):
Albeit, self-organization is quintessentially OBSERVED in the attribution of like like properties.
Thereafter, order is irrelevant.
[*B*]
NOTE:
Neural models SELF ORGANIZE on the horizon of GRADIENT DESCENT bound calculations, as some cost sequence minimizes error on input signals.
Neural models' neuronal/synaptic values are NATURALLY updated (self computed), absent human intervention at said particular juncture; p(x|y).
[*C*]
Diverge definition:
(of a series) increase indefinitely as more of its terms are added.
Erratum:
Albeit, self-organization is quintessentially OBSERVED in the attribution of LIFE** like properties.
(November 9, 2016 at 2:15 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: This reads like it's written by a copy-paste program with veiled chatbot insults.
...Are the aforesaid statistics insulting?