While I do feel the electoral college is rather undemocratic, I don't think getting rid of it is a good idea either.
Clinton won about 60% of California. California's population is roughly 37 million (using total pop vs voting pop for simplicity). That means Clinton would get a little more than 22 million and Trump would get 15 million. Trump would have to win nearly 100% of the 8 least populated states to make up for that. That would give big, populated states a lot of power. Although the EC system favors smaller states it allows them to have a say in the system that would be impossible in a popular system.
I think states should be able to split their electoral votes, like Nebraska and Maine already can.
Clinton won about 60% of California. California's population is roughly 37 million (using total pop vs voting pop for simplicity). That means Clinton would get a little more than 22 million and Trump would get 15 million. Trump would have to win nearly 100% of the 8 least populated states to make up for that. That would give big, populated states a lot of power. Although the EC system favors smaller states it allows them to have a say in the system that would be impossible in a popular system.
I think states should be able to split their electoral votes, like Nebraska and Maine already can.
![[Image: nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWT...dc2a24480e]](https://external-preview.redd.it/nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWTNVY.jpg?width=216&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=7b11e8b38bea0eacc8797fc971574ddc2a24480e)


