(November 8, 2016 at 6:55 pm)abaris Wrote: He claims they had no access to any Trump data and could only publish what he had. I tend to believe him, actually. But he doesn't ask the relevant question. Why's an idiot's campaign so much tighter than the one of a political professional? Honi soit qui mal y pense, as the old saying goes. I'm usually not in the conspiracy camp, but it seems rather obvious that the leak was in a convenient place rather than in a balanced one.
Quote:He also said his organisation had no information about Mrs Clinton's presidential rival Donald Trump that "fufills our editorial criteria."
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/7301...nald-Trump
arrogance.
Why did the 'professional' have her own email server?
why did she keep using it after it had been hacked 9 previous times?
What did she think she was going to happen?
On the other hand what you call an idiot the rest of the cognitive world calls a billionaire. Billionaires are always under attacks from competitors and have learned to 'safegaurd they sh*T' Otherwise they would not be billionaires..
That is why trump calls career politicians stupid. They flipantly deal with highly sensitive infomation without a clue as to technology they are dependent on to keep their secrets secret.
This is why your moron had a private email server that she was using to keep out of the view of congressional over cite. She honestly thought that her private efforts would be as secure as the national governments, which ironically is was.. (meaning hacked) But not as secure as Trump's.
This begs the question when has government ever done things more efficiently than private industry? Never. So then why the surprise that her info is all over the place?
