(November 13, 2016 at 4:15 pm)pocaracas Wrote:Would bursts of excess radiation from the sun or the cosmos around affect radiometric dating? Like when the earth's mag field drops/flips.(November 13, 2016 at 4:13 pm)Edward John Wrote: [*][*]
All radiometric dating methods are based on assumptions about events that happened in the past. If the assumptions are accepted as true (as is typically done in the evolutionary dating processes), results can be biased toward a desired age. In the reported ages given in textbooks and other journals, these evolutionary assumptions have not been questioned, while results inconsistent with long ages have been censored. Therefore completely useless.
Guys, I see we've found an expert!
Do tell us, poor ignorant idiot atheists: what are those assumptions and why are they false, again?
Maybe you should start by telling us how those methods are supposed to work...?
Also, how did you arrive at thousands of years?
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
