(November 13, 2016 at 4:25 pm)Minimalist Wrote:[*](November 13, 2016 at 4:13 pm)Edward John Wrote: [*][*]
All radiometric dating methods are based on assumptions about events that happened in the past. If the assumptions are accepted as true (as is typically done in the evolutionary dating processes), results can be biased toward a desired age. In the reported ages given in textbooks and other journals, these evolutionary assumptions have not been questioned, while results inconsistent with long ages have been censored. Therefore completely useless.
You fucking asshole. Do you manage to successfully delude yourself all day long with this bullshit?
Here's one of your own telling you that you are a shithead.
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources/Wiens.html
Quote:Radiometric Dating
A Christian Perspective
[*]
They have to keep it simple. That's all that christards like Eddie can handle.
Heres another reason why atheism is false.
Quote:The Christian Perspective
by Timothy McCabe
If Atheism is true, then Everything is ultimately the direct result of purely random, uncoordinated and undependable accidents. Note that "Everything" includes Our Conclusions.
If Our Conclusions are ultimately the direct result of purely random, uncoordinated and undependable accidents, then Our Conclusions are entirely random and undependable.
No Atheist believes that his own conclusions are random and undependable, so no Atheist really believes in Atheism.
What we have seen here is that if Atheism is true, there is no possibility of knowledge. However, knowledge is possible; therefore Atheism is certainly not true.
