(November 8, 2016 at 6:55 pm)abaris Wrote: He claims they had no access to any Trump data and could only publish what he had. I tend to believe him, actually. But he doesn't ask the relevant question. Why's an idiot's campaign so much tighter than the one of a political professional? Honi soit qui mal y pense, as the old saying goes. I'm usually not in the conspiracy camp, but it seems rather obvious that the leak was in a convenient place rather than in a balanced one.
Quote:He also said his organisation had no information about Mrs Clinton's presidential rival Donald Trump that "fufills our editorial criteria."
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/7301...nald-Trump
Well considering that Assange's (or should I say Putin's) editorial agenda was "tell any lie to get Trump elected" I wouldn't be surprised if he is sitting on stuff. Stuff that will be revealed the next time the US confronts Russia.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home