(November 15, 2016 at 2:31 am)Ignorant Wrote:(November 14, 2016 at 11:48 pm)Whateverist Wrote: And you won't be able to. There is no possible basis for establishing xtianity as the brand of creator god in question, at least not short of producing god itself (provided he is willing to back your play). [1]
I don't think you appreciate just how little most of us really care about all this talk of the 'supernatural'. [2] While we all have an interest in knowing what is true, none of us has any obligation to invest our precious but limited time seeking to vouchsafe every strange claim some lunatic swears to. [3] And no I don't care a wit that hundreds of people claim to have witnessed miracles. [4]
1) If you say so. What do you think of the "brandless" god in discussion so far?
2) You are the first to mention that word. I think I have appreciated that fact a lot in my contributions on the topic in other places. I hate the term 'supernatural'. What part of my description are you labeling 'supernatural'.
3) So... your time spent responding to me is... charity?
4) What? Where did that come from?
Apologies if I was hasty. Haven't really kept up with the thread or the forums that well very recently. If you truly share a distaste for the very idea of things 'supernatural', hell, I probably owe you a drink. Generally, I fawn all over thoughtful theists so I will probably do better - or be twice as spiteful if I end up feeling you're being disingenuous now. But I at least owe you a chance to fail me.