(November 15, 2016 at 10:05 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Well maybe he is different with me. There's always his responses to me to check.
I'm not going to reread the thread from your perspective.
(November 15, 2016 at 10:05 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: TBH I think it was both very rude and intellectually dishonest of him. Here's me addressing him and here's him bolding one line of my posts and ignoring the rests and then telling me to catch up and condescending me with how he believes in me.
He doesn't have a right to be selective in what he responds to? I think you're reading motive and intent into what sounds like your disappointment in his responses to you.
(November 15, 2016 at 10:05 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: But sure you can all enjoy him as long as you're only caring about how he talks to you. His selectiveness just displays his confirmation bias.
That's a non sequitur.
(November 15, 2016 at 10:05 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: He probably just doesn't want me on his case so he brushed me aside. I'd spot his equivocations too easily.
That must be it. There couldn't be any other reason for the curtness of his responses.[/sarcasm]