Edward John Wrote:FatAndFaithless Wrote:Bolded mine. Okay, you're wrong. That's not what the Big Bang Theory is. You're either ignorant of its actual meaning (which could be remedied by 20 seconds on google) or you're being dishonest. Either way, I don't think people should waste their time with this.
You just I am wrong, but you haven't said Why I am wrong?
Since you are too intellectually lazy and incurious to read a Wikipedia article on the topic: The Big Bang or Initial Expansion describes what happened when the previous state of affairs, a hot, dense, energetic, compressed universe; suddenly started expanding and eventually formed the universe we find ourselves in. The theory doesn't describe why the universe expanded, how long it was in its previous state; whether a moment or an eternity or in-between; but what it does describe is based on astronomical observations and it has been confirmed by finding additional phenomena that the theory predicted we would find if it's true. It's not a theory of ultimate origin. We do not have the physics to describe with certainty what preceded the 'Big Bang'. We have plausible hypotheses, almost too many of them, and as yet no way to confirm which, if any of them, are true. The BBT doesn't try explain what you seem to think it does.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
