If there is a creator, so what?

[Edwardo Piet]

My bold. You're talking about the knowledge of oxygen, not the truth of oxygen.

So is Igno.

My point is you were wrong to call it truth when you're talking about knowledge.

You're not agreeing with me by saying the truth of oxygen wasn't important until we knew about it, lol.

We've never been in disagreement about that, though you did fuck up a response -to- it, which made you disagree with both of us.  There are always three people in our conversations, lol.  It reminds me of a joke about rabbis.

No you messed up lol. We started disagreeing when you said that the truth of oxygen wasn't important until it was discovered when actually it's been important as long as we've been around to breathe it. It's the knowledge of oxygen that hasn't been important until it was discovered.

The existence of oxygen was, but not the knowledge of it.  The knowledge is -still- unimportant to the subject in question, even though we possess it.

Yes, the existence and truth of it has been important. The existence of oxygen and the fact that it's true that it exists has been important to us for as long as we've been breathing. Yes the knowledge of it has only been important since it has been discovered.... but you didn't say that. You said the truth of it has only been important since it has been discovered. That's not true. The truth of the existence of oxygen has always been important to us. It's only the knowledge of the existence of oxygen that hasn't been.

You pointed out something that you thought I said was innaccurate, "correcting" me by repacking my statements in other formulations

It is inaccurate. You said that the truth of oxygen wasn't important until it was discovered. But it's always been important. It's the knowledge of it that hasn't always been.

 You imagine disagreement and then respond.

I see inaccuracy and then I respond.

 You do it more than you realize.  I've learned that it's pointless to get in your way when you're in that mood.

You mean it's pointless to admit you were wrong when I'm in the mood for correcting all your inaccuracies?

INB4 you tell me I;m wrong in this, as well:

Whatever you say, as ever, Ham.  

You are wrong. You've already contradicted yourself and proved me right. You started by saying the truth of oxygen wasn't important until it was discovered and then you've since changed that statement to the knowledge of it:

The existence of oxygen was, but not the knowledge of it.  The knowledge is -still- unimportant to the subject in question, even though we possess it.

My bolding.

When I show one of your assertions to be inaccurate, instead of saying "oops" and thanking me for correcting you or admitting you were wrong about something you just change your assertion and tell me you were agreeing with me the whole time even when you said something inaccurate that I disagreed with