Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

He's not a physicist. The likelihood that that happened is the same as you being an A. I. created by dogs.

(A)

Indeed, a typographical error of mine.

Sam is but a neuroscientist.

I had been observing a debate, between William Lane Craig and Sean Caroll, a physicist.
I am reminded of Sam Harris, in observing Sean Caroll.

Therein the typographical error occurred prior.

(B)

It seems you are ignoring certain sequences.

There already exists efficient, non-cumbersome neurosynaptic chips that yield 10^14 synaptic operations per second. (of the estimated 10^16-18 synaptic operations computed by the human brain)



Such is quite the theistic behaviour; for you ignore viable sequences on the horizon of emotional bias.

---

Hehehe

ProgrammingGodJordan just got banned on The Thinking Atheist. He posted the same OP there and it was pointed out quite how it had already turned out on AF. They obviously recognised that he lacked any entertainment value as a chew toy, would not respond to any questions and just kept spamming the same shit again and again.

His thread made 3 pages before he got banned.

http://www.thethinkingatheist.com/forum/...ype-of-God

I was indeed banned.
I had predominantly duplicated a response roughly thrice [including an identical portion in roughly three distinct responses], and so my activities were detected as spam.
Albeit, I tend to reuse responses, SOLELY where applicable.

NOTE: I notice, that I tend not to recieve banning, on threads where moderators partake in some profound science/study [physics, mathematics]. Otherwise, where intellect withers, bans are almost certain.

---