Silly Creationist

[Cinjin]

---

Where do the creators of the Creation Museum state they do not believe Natural Selection occurs? Natural Selection in no way proves Common Descent.

Ken Ham, Kent Hovind, et al., have flatly stated that we don't evolve, we were created exactly like this. Stupidest people on the planet.

---

Kent Hovind is not affiliated with the Creation Museum. Ken Ham accepts that Natural Selection happens, he denies Common Descent. So I guess I will ask again, where do the founders of the Creation Museum (AIG) state they reject Natural Selection like it was asserted they did?

---

---

This is how I see creationists; either they do not want to see the truth or they simply do not understand simple ideas.

That's funny, that's how I see Evolutionists.

Hhmmmmmmm ... you CAN see where the flaw is in that logic right?

#1 Evolutionists can't see the truth? What truth? The unprovable "truth" of the biblical creation???
#2 Evolutionists don't understand simple ideas? You mean like a talking snake and tree with magical fruit??


Please tell me you were just making a joke and I'll drop it.

---

1. Yes they willfully suppress the truth (Romans 1) and let their anti-biblical presuppositions drive the interpretation of the evidence. They use the proof that they assumed to argue against creation, illogical.
2. They do not get such simple ideas as classical logic, every argument I have ever heard for Common Descent commits the fallacy of affirming the consequent. So I guess you can admit you were mistaken and I will drop it

lol - I assumed neither of us would drop it even when I wrote that.

To your #1 response: Again I'm curious what your definition of 'the truth' is? And what evidence you have of evolutionists suppressing it?
Even if you find the 'proof' to be unsatisfactory, it is still more substantial than no proof. As has been stated many times before, the Bible cannot be used as legitimate 'proof' of creation.
To your #2 response: Are we going to get into another debate about "what is Logic"?