William Lane Craig unmasked.

[robvalue]

Here's WLC getting embarassed some more:

I think Craig is on point here.  His opponent is drawing value judgements about harming others out of thin air, without really justifying why they are moral values.  He's engaged in a classic example of Moore's naturalistic fallacy.  So ultimately, I think the point goes to Craig.


“If everything on earth were rational, nothing would happen.”
― Fyodor Dostoyevsky

I agree, Sam Harris pretty much does the same thing. It's pre-packaged philosophy, being snuck in. Of course most people tend to agree anyway, but that doesn't validate the argument. It's just exclusionary thinking.