(December 6, 2016 at 11:34 am)TheRealJoeFish Wrote:(December 6, 2016 at 11:26 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Well...I mean I think the more reasonable conclusion is that people who are more sexually active (and thus susceptible to STIs) are more likely to engage is pubic hair grooming more regularly.
Yeah, I mean.... I'm not gonna click on that article to see if they controlled for confounding variables.............
I mean, it wouldn't stun me if a reasonable case could be made out that pubic hair has something to do with disease prevention from an evolutionary standpoint (I mean, clearly, it reduces skin-on-skin contact), but F&F's point seems likely to me. Interesting................
I thought pubic hair acted as a non-moist lubricant.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.