Is the statement "Claims demand evidence" always true?

[Mudhammam]

Yeh.  It seems to me you could call it a singularity, or the Logos, or God, or probably a lot of other things.

But saying its vague and abstract and even paradoxical does not imbue it with the psychological proclivities of a particularly self-deluded species, which is an objectively worse (because its infinitely misleading) manner of description. Same with using words embedded with historical or religious significance, such as Logos, Architect, or Creator.