I'm not entirely understanding this.
Some atheists equate the probability of the existence of God to the probability of the existence of Unicorns. I understand this is because both of the supernatural creatures have no evidence of their existence and thus are extremely improbable, but some atheists use the "unicorn" argument for the justification for them saying God doesn't exist. Isn't that more of a cop-out? Thanks in advance.
Some atheists equate the probability of the existence of God to the probability of the existence of Unicorns. I understand this is because both of the supernatural creatures have no evidence of their existence and thus are extremely improbable, but some atheists use the "unicorn" argument for the justification for them saying God doesn't exist. Isn't that more of a cop-out? Thanks in advance.
