(June 21, 2011 at 3:39 pm)Epimethean Wrote: Why, when he has done nothing to discredit Dawkins?
He has nothing on Dawkins, Dennett or Sloan Wilson. The fact that he is so lonely in his contentions might be one of the best evidences against him.
Yeah I figured you'd retreat on that one. How do you know he has not refuted Dawkins? You have not even read his book. Secondly, scientific fact is never based on consensus, so your appeal to it is completely fallacious. Thirdly, Dawkins does not have a degree in Philosophy nor Theology, so given your reasoning is he not allowed to right books on such matters? He has though.