RE: I need a bit of help (a link or something)
June 21, 2011 at 4:35 pm
(This post was last modified: June 21, 2011 at 4:38 pm by 5thHorseman.)
Very well said that man.
Maybe because religion can(is) man made, thus anyone can chat shot about it. Biology is facts with empirical evidence. Quite different I think you'll agree.
(June 21, 2011 at 3:43 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:(June 21, 2011 at 3:39 pm)Epimethean Wrote: Why, when he has done nothing to discredit Dawkins?
He has nothing on Dawkins, Dennett or Sloan Wilson. The fact that he is so lonely in his contentions might be one of the best evidences against him.
Yeah I figured you'd retreat on that one. How do you know he has not refuted Dawkins? You have not even read his book. Secondly, scientific fact is never based on consensus, so your appeal to it is completely fallacious. Thirdly, Dawkins does not have a degree in Philosophy nor Theology, so given your reasoning is he not allowed to right books on such matters? He has though.
Maybe because religion can(is) man made, thus anyone can chat shot about it. Biology is facts with empirical evidence. Quite different I think you'll agree.
