"God doesn't Exist"- Claim or Conclusion

[Pat Mustard]

You can assume all you want. "God does not exist" cannot be the null hypothesis.

You are unwilling to.provide evidence for god, you are unwilling to provide even a hypothesis fo how god can exist totally outside reality (the definition of supernatural being) and control every aspect of reality, hell, your god grows and shrinks with the needs of your argumentation, one minute he's an all powerful being who controls everything, the next he a weak and stupid old man who cannot properly create humanity nor control his own creation.

And you're wrong on about the null hypothesis. Asserting a lack of god isn't a positive claim, asserting god is. Therefore the burden of evidence is with those like you who demand that we accept god is real (this despite the sum total of our current knowledge indicating that god is not neccessary and quite a lot of it suggesting there is no god).