Hilarious! Trump having problems finding artists.

[SteelCurtain]

First of all, you are making it seem like even if the law about rape excludes females from being charged with specifically rape, that they would just walk off free without being charged with any crime.

When a woman rape someone she should get charged with rape. Period.

Agreed. But until precedent is set, the laws are the laws. After the trial convicting the woman of another crime, they can change the law. But again, you have yet to provide an instance where a woman who raped a man has been let off or not convicted of rape when they committed the crime.

Forced sexual intercourse including both psychological coercion as well as physical force. Forced sexual intercourse means vaginal, anal or oral penetration by the offender (s). This category also includes incidents where the penetration is from a foreign object such as a bottle.Includes attempted rapes, male as well as female victims, and both heterosexual and same sex rape. Attempted rape includes verbal threats of rape.

The first definition I quoted from Wikipedia isn't much different from this. Both require penetration of some kind for a unsolicited sexual act to be considered rape. How exactly would a female rapist that ride a passed out man be convicted for rape? There is no penetration which according to common sense can only be done with a penis and not a vagina. Hence why I said female rapists are legally protected.

Except you only partially read the definition. You intentionally unbolded the part that I bolded, which completely invalidates your claim. Also, a woman can use a man's penis to initiate unwanted penetration. Here is a clarification of the legal definition of penetration, according to the Texas Penal Code:

Causes the sexual organ of another person, without that person’s consent, to contact or penetrate the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of another person, including the actor; or

So, you're wrong. The act of penetration can be performed by a woman, using a man's penis. And this, using one of the most backwards penal codes available in the United States.

I still do not see how this is a 'left' or 'right' issue.

It isn't. I said extreme leftists support these types of laws not leftists.

Again, we're drifting off subject, my point was that extreme leftists ideas are far more mainstream than extreme rightist ideas, in fact, I don't think there is a single mainstream extreme rightist idea floating around since forever, which is good, just that the left extremists shouldn't have their crazy ideas floating around either.

So it isn't, but then you immediately say it is. Literally the next sentence. This isn't an ideology of the left or the right extreme. It's an ideology that you've largely made up and pinned on leftist extremists in order to further your point. To even suggest that this is a mainstream thing is more proof to the point.