data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c23e/9c23e43e2aa828f47827da66cafc73de900d0471" alt="Smile Smile"
RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked&qu...
December 30, 2016 at 1:46 am
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2016 at 2:01 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(December 30, 2016 at 1:22 am)robvalue Wrote: No, I don't hold anything to be absolute.
But as many have explained, including me, beliefs need not be absolute. Your position is the same as most people on this forum, you're just using narrow definitions for words.
If you continue to misunderstand this, I can only assume you're doing so deliberately in order to feel some sort of sense of elitism; like the "just agnostics" we get here who try and look down on "silly atheists", while actually having the same position.
Or you're screwing with us.
Of course, what is supposedly believed in may be nonsense, as is clear, and as I priorly wrote in linked articles.
However, the being herein accepts such nonsense as true/ABSOLUTE. (absolute is synonym for 'true'):
![[Image: vDbc7PW.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FvDbc7PW.png)